Online tools usually start with assumptions: age at death, a simplified family situation, and generic averages for “pain and suffering.” Those estimates can be useful for basic planning, but they often fail to reflect what matters in real Claremont cases—especially when liability and causation are disputed.
In practice, insurers and attorneys focus on evidence that supports (or undermines):
- Who was at fault based on traffic controls, witness accounts, and vehicle data
- Whether the injury caused the death (medical records, timing, complications)
- How damages are documented (earnings, support, funeral costs, and relationship impact)
- Whether comparative fault applies under New Hampshire law
So instead of treating a calculator output like a prediction, think of it as a starting point for the categories of loss that may be available.


