A calculator typically uses broad inputs—age, income, dependents, and a damage “multiplier.” But wrongful death settlements are rarely driven by averages.
In Flat Rock, the cases we see often involve issues that calculators can’t properly weigh, such as:
- Comparative fault arguments (common in traffic incidents where multiple factors are alleged)
- Insurance limits and how they interact with multiple parties (drivers, employers, property owners)
- Causation disputes (for example, whether a pre-existing condition contributed, or whether the incident triggered a fatal decline)
- Evidence availability—what was preserved after the initial shock, and what wasn’t
Michigan courts expect proof, and insurers value cases based on proof. That’s why two families can enter the process with similar losses and end up with very different settlement outcomes.


