Most calculators are built around simplified assumptions. They typically ask for general information such as the deceased person’s age, their income or earning capacity, whether they had dependents, and sometimes the nature of the incident. Based on that, the calculator produces a rough estimate of economic and non-economic damages.
In Colorado, that “rough estimate” should be treated as a starting point, not as a promise. Real cases turn on proof. Insurance adjusters and attorneys evaluate whether the evidence supports liability, whether the death was caused by the incident, and what losses can be documented. Two families can enter the same incident type—like a truck collision on Colorado’s highways or a slip-and-fall in a commercial setting—and still see drastically different results because the evidence and damages proof differ.
A calculator can also help you organize your thinking. It may prompt you to consider what expenses exist now, what financial support the decedent would likely have provided, and what non-economic losses are tied to the relationship. But the calculator cannot decide what a jury would believe, what medical records show, or whether the defense will raise issues like comparative responsibility or disputed causation.


