In a city like San Gabriel—where commuters, school drop-offs, and dense street activity overlap with regional freight movement—truck crashes can create complicated fault questions quickly. Adjusters may argue that:
- the crash was driven by a lane change or visibility issue,
- a driver acted reasonably under California roadway rules,
- or the injured person contributed to the collision.
In California, that matters because comparative fault can reduce compensation even if the truck driver was also at fault. In practice, it means your “settlement estimate” should reflect not only your injuries, but also how the evidence supports (or undermines) the competing narratives.


