Most online tools are built around assumptions: the length of treatment, a simplified injury severity model, and a generic timeline. Those can be useful for a rough starting point, but they don’t account for what frequently matters in New York claim handling.
In practice, adjusters weigh:
- Whether the injury narrative matches the medical timeline (when symptoms started, how they progressed, and what providers documented)
- Whether treatment followed reasonable next steps (and why any gaps occurred)
- How the impact affected function—not just diagnoses
- How fault is disputed in the specific incident (traffic, crosswalks, construction zones, or unclear reporting)
A calculator can’t know what your ER record says, whether you’re dealing with ongoing cognitive symptoms, or how your particular work schedule and commute were disrupted.


