In many head injury cases, the dispute isn’t whether symptoms exist—it’s whether they’re credible, consistent, and connected to the crash or incident.
Michigan adjusters and defense counsel typically focus on questions like:
- Were symptoms reported promptly? Delays can give the other side room to argue the TBI is unrelated.
- Did medical providers document function, not just complaints? In TBI cases, notes that describe how symptoms affect memory, sleep, concentration, mood, and work performance carry more weight.
- Is there continuity in treatment or a clear reason for gaps? Missed therapy appointments without explanation can be used to minimize severity.
- Do the records match the mechanism of injury? Even if imaging is normal, clinicians can still diagnose concussion and document ongoing limitations—especially when the history is consistent.
For Woodhaven residents, this matters because suburban accidents may be underreported or described as “minor” right after the crash. Later, symptoms can become more disruptive—making early documentation crucial.


