Many online tools treat a TBI like a standard template—injury severity in, payout range out. Real cases don’t work that way.
In the Mount Clemens area, insurers often focus on whether they can argue one or more of the following:
- Your symptoms were caused by something else (a prior condition, an unrelated incident, or delayed onset)
- The injury wasn’t as serious as you say because of gaps in treatment or inconsistencies in how symptoms are described
- Fault is shared, especially when crashes involve sudden stops, lane changes, or unclear witness information
- Your functional limits weren’t documented, even if you felt “off” (memory, headaches, concentration, sleep, mood, balance)
A calculator might suggest a “range,” but it typically won’t account for how Michigan adjusters evaluate proof quality and risk in a negotiation.


