Most online tools generate a rough range based on generic assumptions. Jacksonville cases often diverge from those assumptions because insurers evaluate real-world proof, such as:
- Treatment timing and continuity after the accident (gaps are frequently questioned)
- How symptoms affected daily functioning—not just whether you had a concussion diagnosis
- Objective records (ER findings, imaging when applicable, neurocognitive testing, therapy notes)
- Work and commute disruption (missed shifts, reduced productivity, missed deadlines)
In negotiations, adjusters aren’t just estimating medical severity—they’re pricing the risk of what a jury might believe based on documentation.


