Most calculators work like this: you enter basic information (injury severity, treatment length, lost income), and the tool produces an educational range. That output may be useful for planning conversations, but it is not a prediction of what an insurer will offer.
In real Minneapolis cases, the value is driven by evidence quality and proof—not just the label of the injury. A tool also can’t reliably account for:
- whether the defense disputes liability (for example, conflicting reports after a crash)
- whether medical providers consistently connect the accident to the neurological findings
- how winter-related complications or mobility limitations affect medical follow-up and daily functioning
Bottom line: treat a calculator as a worksheet, not an answer.


