Many people assume a slip and fall claim is only valid if a property owner “meant” for someone to get hurt. That is not how these cases work. The real question is usually whether the property owner, business, or manager failed to use reasonable care to keep the area safe or to warn people about a hazard that should have been addressed.
In South Carolina, another reason these cases feel different is that insurers often focus heavily on shifting blame. They may argue you should have seen the hazard, chosen a different route, or watched your step. Because SC follows a fault-based approach that can reduce compensation when you are partly responsible, the way evidence is gathered and presented matters early. A strong claim is often built on ordinary facts that show the hazard was predictable and preventable, not on dramatic accusations.


