Orlando has unique patterns that affect what “reasonable security” looks like. Cases often involve situations such as:
- After-hours activity near parking and entrances: attacks in parking lots, stairwells, or on routes between the building and vehicle—areas where lighting, cameras, and controlled access matter.
- Hotels and short-term rentals: incidents involving unauthorized entry, doors that don’t lock properly, inconsistent monitoring, or guests harmed in common areas.
- Large apartment communities: assaults or harassment in poorly monitored amenities, elevators, mail areas, or breezeways—particularly when prior complaints weren’t addressed.
- Retail centers with high foot traffic: incidents where staff did not respond to credible threats, where cameras didn’t cover key choke points, or where access points were left unsecured.
- Event crowds and seasonal surges: when properties expect larger numbers of people, security planning should change—yet sometimes it doesn’t.
In each scenario, the question becomes: what did the property know (or should have known), and what security measures were in place when the risk was foreseeable?


