Most calculators work by using inputs like:
- injury severity and treatment duration
- medical bills
- lost wages
- sometimes pain-and-suffering assumptions
That can be useful while you’re gathering records. But in Minnesota, settlement value is still driven by evidence—especially when the other side argues comparative fault or challenges whether your injuries were caused by the crash.
So instead of treating a calculator output like a promise, use it as a framework:
- What losses are you currently documenting?
- Which losses are still developing?
- What facts will likely decide fault in your case?


