On roads with limited sightlines and changing traffic flow, insurers frequently argue about what each person “should have seen” and when. That means the same type of injury can lead to very different settlement results depending on evidence like:
- Skid marks, debris location, and vehicle positions captured in the accident report
- Dash cam or nearby camera footage (including from homes or businesses when available)
- Lighting and weather conditions (glare, dusk, fog, wet pavement)
- Whether the rider’s actions were consistent with safe riding at the moment of impact
In Orinda, where drivers often mix local trips with commuter traffic, fault can also become contested when there are conflicting accounts or when a driver claims they didn’t expect a motorcycle to be where it was.


