Most AI tools work from simplified inputs—age, relationship, and a few financial categories—then produce a “range.” That can sound reassuring, but it often ignores the elements that drive value in a real wrongful death claim:
- Causation disputes (for example, whether the fatal outcome was tied to a crash, a later medical complication, or other intervening factors)
- Comparative negligence questions (West Virginia uses modified comparative-fault rules, and how responsibility is allocated can substantially affect recovery)
- Evidence that exists locally but isn’t captured online (dashcam/video, traffic signal history, roadway conditions, witness statements from neighbors or businesses, and incident documentation)
- Insurance and procedure realities (adjusters evaluate exposure differently than a calculator does)
In other words: an AI output may help you identify what questions to ask—but it shouldn’t drive decisions.


