Many AI tools generate a “range” based on generic inputs—age, relationship, and broad categories of damages. That can be a starting point, but it often overlooks the details that decide whether a wrongful death claim succeeds or stalls.
In Washington Court House, the difference usually comes down to evidence you can’t reliably “calculate”:
- Whether police and crash reconstruction (when applicable) support the claimed cause
- Whether witness statements are consistent with the medical timeline
- Whether records show a continuing medical deterioration after the initial injury
- Whether fault is shared among multiple parties (common in multi-vehicle crashes and complex workplace settings)
AI can’t obtain reports, interpret causation, or evaluate credibility. Insurance adjusters and Ohio courts do.


