AI tools may ask for basic details (age, income, relationship, medical bills) and then output a “range.” That can feel helpful, but it often misses what matters most in real cases—especially in fatal incidents involving:
- Commuter collisions on faster routes and merge points
- Intersection or turn errors near retail and office corridors
- Pedestrian or cyclist incidents where visibility and warning signals are disputed
- Multi-vehicle crashes where fault is contested among multiple parties
In Ohio, the settlement picture can shift quickly depending on evidence such as traffic camera footage, witness credibility, skid/impact data, and medical records showing causation.
An AI calculator can’t review police narratives, evaluate driver statements, interpret reconstruction results, or anticipate defenses like comparative fault.


