AI tools typically ask for a handful of details (age, relationship, basic expenses, and the general type of incident) and then output a “range.” That can temporarily reduce the panic of not knowing.
However, in Wallington, the reality is that claims often turn on specifics you may not have at the beginning—such as:
- what the responding reports actually say about fault
- how quickly records were obtained from providers and employers
- whether video, traffic camera footage, or witness statements can be preserved
- whether the defense argues the death was caused by an intervening factor
AI doesn’t “see” those gaps. And it can’t evaluate whether the evidence will hold up in negotiation—or if the claim would need to be prepared for litigation.


