Online tools typically ask for basic facts—your loved one’s age, the relationship to surviving family, and some financial details—then output a rough range. For Southfield cases, that range may feel tempting because it offers immediate structure when you’re dealing with bills, disrupted income, and unanswered questions.
However, AI tools are limited in three ways that often matter locally:
- Local evidence realities: In Detroit-area traffic and construction zones, key proof can be time-sensitive—dashcam footage may be overwritten, scene photos may be incomplete, and witness accounts can diverge.
- Michigan-specific claim posture: Insurers don’t evaluate claims like a calculator does. They assess litigation risk under the facts they can prove.
- Causation disputes: In many fatal incidents, the defense argues the death wasn’t caused by the defendant’s conduct—or that another factor broke the chain.
A calculator may help you organize questions. It cannot replace a lawyer’s review of liability, damages, and the evidence needed to support them.


