Many AI tools work by asking for basic facts and then producing a “range.” The problem is that wrongful death outcomes depend heavily on details that an online form usually can’t capture. In Dearborn, common fact patterns can change the case significantly, such as:
- Crash causation disputes (e.g., speed, lane position, distractions, or how traffic control was handled)
- Competing accounts from witnesses in fast-moving incident scenes
- Multiple parties (drivers, employers, property owners, contractors, insurers)
- Timing gaps between the initial injury and later complications
When liability is unclear—or when Michigan defenses argue the death wasn’t caused by the defendant’s actions—an AI estimate can become little more than a guess.


