Many AI and online tools are built for “average” cases. Malden cases often turn on fact patterns that don’t fit averages, such as:
- Intersection and crosswalk crashes involving timing, sightlines, and driver attention
- Commute-related collisions where speed, distraction, or lane control is disputed
- Bus/commuter traffic interactions where multiple parties may be alleged to have contributed
- Pedestrian and cyclist injuries where causation may be contested between multiple actors
A calculator can’t review the incident footage, traffic signal timing, vehicle event data, witness credibility, or whether an investigation supports the theory you need.


