In practical terms, the biggest gaps with AI tools show up in road and traffic-related wrongful death matters, including:
- Causation disputes (e.g., whether a driver’s failure to yield, speeding, distracted driving, or sudden impairment actually caused the fatal outcome)
- Evidence that isn’t captured online (dashcam availability, witness observations, vehicle data, and early scene documentation)
- Comparative fault considerations (Kentucky juries may assign responsibility across parties, which can affect recovery)
- Insurance posture (adjusters often rely on their own assessment of risk rather than “average” outcomes)
AI can’t interview witnesses, examine reports, or review medical records. It also can’t evaluate how Kentucky courts and insurance adjusters typically react when liability is contested.


