Many AI tools model outcomes using generic assumptions. That can be misleading when the case turns on issues like:
- Which driver had the duty to yield or maintain control under the specific circumstances (intersection, lane change, merge, turn, weather, visibility)
- Causation—what actually caused the fatal outcome versus what happened afterward (e.g., delays in care, complications, or pre-existing conditions)
- Evidence availability in the days after the crash—what’s preserved, what’s lost, and what’s disputed
- Insurance posture—how insurers value risk when liability is contested or when the family is still waiting on key records
In other words: a calculator might provide a starting point, but it can’t evaluate the evidence strength that drives settlement negotiations in Illinois.


