Most AI tools generate a broad “range” by using averages. That can be useful for planning questions, but it’s not built for the realities that show up in Lilburn wrongful death matters, such as:
- Crash complexity on high-speed roads (multiple vehicles, lane changes, visibility issues, or driving behaviors that require reconstruction)
- Disputed fault (where each side points to different contributing causes)
- Causation questions (whether the fatal outcome was directly tied to the incident or affected by intervening medical factors)
- Insurance coverage and policy limits (which can cap realistic settlement outcomes)
In other words, a calculator may produce a figure, but it can’t evaluate whether the evidence would convince an insurer—or a jury—that someone else is legally responsible.


