Most AI tools work by asking for a few basics (age, relationship, medical expenses, and sometimes income). They then apply broad assumptions and produce a number that looks objective.
The problem is that California wrongful death settlements are driven by case-specific evidence—especially where fault is disputed. In San Bruno, that can include:
- Conflicting accounts after a crash (who had the right of way, visibility at the time, speed, distraction)
- Causation questions (whether the incident triggered complications later)
- Insurance positioning early in the process (adjusters may push for quick statements or “record-only” valuations)
- Document gaps (missing medical records, incomplete employment verification, unclear funeral expense documentation)
An AI estimate can’t review the police report narrative, evaluate witness credibility, interpret medical causation, or anticipate how defense counsel will frame liability. It also can’t tell you what evidence is missing—until you’re already in negotiations.


