Clay residents spend a lot of time on the roads—commutes, school drop-offs, late errands, and weekend travel. Unfortunately, fatal incidents on highways and local roads often involve details that generic tools can’t reliably account for, such as:
- Speed, lane position, and visibility (day vs. night, weather, glare)
- Driver distraction evidence (phone usage, maintenance of attention, witness perspective)
- Causation disputes (complications after the crash, intervening factors)
- Shared fault issues (comparative responsibility allegations can reshape a claim)
An AI estimate can’t review the dashcam/video, police findings, scene diagrams, medical timelines, or how insurance adjusters will frame fault. In Clay, where many fatal cases involve real-world driving conditions and conflicting accounts, evidence quality matters more than “averages.”


