Most AI tools rely on simplified inputs—age, type of incident, basic wage info, and a few relationship details—to produce a number. That can feel helpful, but it often ignores what drives outcomes in real Alabama cases:
- Alabama’s wrongful death framework focuses on damages in a way that doesn’t map neatly to “average settlement” formulas you’ll see online.
- Causation disputes are common—especially when a death occurs days or weeks after an accident (medical complications, delayed effects, or intervening factors).
- Liability evidence varies dramatically from crash to crash or workplace incident to incident.
- Insurance evaluation is not the same as an algorithm’s scoring. Adjusters consider litigation risk, documentation, and how a case would likely play out.
In short: an AI number can’t review the police report, medical timeline, witness accounts, maintenance records, or the specific facts that make a claim strong (or weak).


