An AI tool typically asks for details like your injury type, treatment dates, missed work, and job restrictions. Based on patterns from other cases, it may generate a range.
That can be useful for getting a starting point, but it’s not built to see the documents that actually drive outcomes in South Carolina—such as:
- the exact medical restrictions your doctor issues and how consistently they’re documented
- whether your treatment plan tracks the alleged mechanism of injury
- wage records that match your pay schedule and job classification
- how disputes are developing procedurally (acceptance, contested issues, or delayed benefits)
In practice, the biggest gap is that AI can’t evaluate what the insurer will argue about causation, maximum medical improvement, or the credibility of the work-injury narrative when competing explanations exist.


