AI tools often produce a “range” based on common patterns. The problem is that Central Falls cases tend to turn on details that a calculator can’t see—like how quickly you were treated, how clearly your restrictions were documented, and whether the insurer believes your work limitations match your day-to-day functioning.
In practice, insurers may scrutinize:
- The timing between the incident and reporting/treatment (delays can raise credibility questions)
- Whether your restrictions were written clearly (vague limitations can reduce leverage)
- Consistency across medical notes (gaps or conflicting summaries can change the valuation)
- How your injury affects real work capacity, not just symptoms
An AI output may look “reasonable,” yet still miss the key issue driving value in your specific file: what the paperwork can prove.


