AI tools typically work by comparing your inputs to patterns from other injury stories. That can produce a range that sounds reasonable.
In Sweet Home and across Oregon, the bigger problem is that the most valuable details aren’t just “what injury you reported.” They’re the details that show up in the paperwork and medical notes—details that AI can’t reliably see. For example:
- Work restrictions that are specific enough to matter. If your treating clinician documents limitations in a way that ties to your actual job duties, it changes what the insurer can credibly argue.
- Consistency between what you reported and what’s documented. Insurers often weigh contemporaneous records heavily.
- Whether treatment links symptoms to the work incident. If the record is vague, insurers may push back on causation.
AI doesn’t review your documents—it only processes what you type in. If you’re missing a key date, restriction detail, or wage component, the estimate can drift quickly.


