AI tools generally work by comparing your inputs (injury type, body part, treatment timeline, wage info) to patterns from other cases. That can produce a range that looks believable.
The problem is that Ohio workers’ comp is evidence-driven. Two injuries that seem similar on paper can move very differently depending on:
- whether your work restrictions are clearly documented by your treating provider
- how consistently symptoms are recorded over time
- whether the insurer disputes causation or the extent of impairment
- whether you were able to stay at (or return to) work in a way that matches the medical restrictions
In Wooster, we also see how quickly people try to resolve matters—especially when bills pile up or when employers encourage a fast return to normal. That urgency can collide with what the medical record actually supports.


