AI tools typically work like this: you enter injury details, treatment timing, and wage information, and the tool produces a range based on patterns from other claims.
The problem is that workers’ comp outcomes are heavily influenced by what’s in the record. In Lexington, that usually means evidence tied to:
- Shift-based wage loss (overtime, shift differentials, and consistent schedules that change after restrictions)
- Functional limitations that show up in work status notes (not just your diagnosis)
- Activity at the time of injury (line work, loading/unloading, jobsite conditions, or repetitive tasks)
- Whether restrictions were followed (and how quickly you were returned to modified duties)
A calculator may assume a “standard” recovery timeline. If your restrictions were documented early—or if they were inconsistent—your value can move significantly.


