AI tools generally work by taking the details you type in (injury type, treatment history, missed work, restrictions) and comparing them to generalized patterns. That can produce a range that sounds reasonable.
The problem is that New York workers’ compensation disputes often turn on specifics—medical documentation quality, consistency of restrictions, and whether the insurer believes the work incident caused the condition. If your file is stronger than the AI assumes, you may be underestimating your settlement. If your file is weaker, an AI range may overpromise.
In Tarrytown, that “gap” between estimate and reality is especially common when:
- Your symptoms affected your ability to commute and perform job duties, but your restrictions weren’t documented clearly.
- Your treatment plan changed over time (for example, gaps in therapy, delayed imaging, or revised work limits).
- The insurer questions causation because your medical timeline could be interpreted in more than one way.


