Many AI tools start with a simple premise: input your injury details, get an estimated range, and assume the case will follow a similar pattern.
In real Geneva workers’ compensation cases, that assumption can break down because settlement value depends on specifics the tool usually can’t “see,” such as:
- How consistently your symptoms and restrictions are recorded across visits
- Whether your treating provider’s work limitations are specific enough to connect to job duties
- Whether wage loss is supported by payroll records and not just your memory
- Whether the insurer disputes key points like causation or the extent of impairment
A calculator may generate a plausible-looking estimate, but it can’t confirm whether the insurer will accept your timeline, your medical narrative, or your level of functional loss.


