AI tools typically work by pattern-matching the details you type in—injury type, missed work, treatment timeline, and limitations—to generate a rough range.
That’s where the trouble starts: two Ann Arbor workers can describe the same diagnosis and still have very different outcomes because the insurer focuses on details like:
- How your restrictions were documented (and how consistently)
- Whether your treatment shows steady progress or gaps the insurer highlights
- Whether the file supports a work-connected cause
- How wage loss is supported when your schedule includes overtime, shift changes, or variable hours
If your estimate feels “too low” or “too high,” it’s often not because the AI is broken—it’s because the calculator can’t see the specific evidence that Michigan adjusters and evaluators rely on.


