AI tools usually work by taking inputs you provide—injury type, date of injury, treatment history, work limits—and comparing them to patterns from other cases. That can produce a range that sounds plausible.
In Fitchburg, though, the gap between “estimate” and “offer” often comes from details the tool can’t properly verify, like:
- Whether your treating provider’s notes clearly connect symptoms to work activity
- Whether your restrictions were documented in a way insurers consider “work-ready” (or not)
- Whether medical improvement was reached (or whether symptoms persisted) at the point the insurer is trying to settle
- How wage loss is supported when your pay varies due to overtime, shift timing, or job classification
In short: an AI estimate can help you understand the questions to ask, but it can’t replace the Massachusetts-specific realities that determine what an insurer will approve or contest.


