AI tools typically work by taking the facts you type in—injury type, body part, treatment timeline, wage loss—and comparing them to patterns from other cases. That can produce a settlement range that sounds reasonable.
In Morton Grove, where many claims involve repetitive-motion injuries, workplace accidents in industrial settings, and injuries discovered after a commute or shift change, the biggest weaknesses of AI estimates are usually these:
- Documentation timing: If your symptoms weren’t recorded consistently from the beginning (or you delayed reporting), insurers may argue the injury is less tied to work.
- Real-world job demands: A calculator can’t measure how your restrictions affect the exact kind of work you do—especially for jobs requiring lifting, climbing, or long hours on your feet.
- Medical narrative gaps: If your records show treatment but not clear limitations and functional impact, the “value” AI assumes can be too low.
An AI range can be a starting point—but it should not be the final word on what your settlement should look like.


