AI tools typically ask for information like:
- date of injury
- body part and diagnosis
- time missed from work
- treatment history
- work restrictions (or what you think your restrictions are)
Then the tool compares your inputs to generalized patterns and outputs an estimated range.
The problem is that workers’ compensation outcomes in Georgia hinge on details that an AI calculator usually can’t verify, such as:
- whether your medical records consistently link your symptoms to the work event
- how specific your restrictions are (and whether they’re documented by the treating provider)
- whether the insurer believes you reached maximum medical improvement and what that means in your case
- whether wage records and benefit history line up with the time periods you claim
In other words, an AI range can be “reasonable” and still be wrong for your claim—particularly if your case turns on disputes over work restrictions, causation, or the credibility of your timeline.


