Most AI tools prompt you to describe what happened and what you experienced afterward. They may ask about where the crash occurred, how serious your injuries are, how long you were treated, and whether you missed work. From there, the tool attempts to approximate how a claim might be valued using common categories of damages.
In West Virginia, that framing can be useful as a starting point, but it can also be misleading if your case has complications that generic models do not understand. Truck crashes often involve multiple potential responsible parties, such as the truck driver, the trucking company, maintenance contractors, cargo shippers, or equipment and parts providers. An AI estimate generally cannot confirm which of those parties are legally responsible in your situation.
Another limitation is that AI tools rely on simplified assumptions. Real cases involve disputed facts, inconsistent witness accounts, gaps in documentation, and insurance defenses that require careful legal responses. A calculator may generate a range, but it cannot assess how credible your evidence will be when reviewed by an adjuster or a judge.
It’s also important to remember that settlement value is not only about “how much harm you had,” but also about “how well you can prove it.” In practice, the strongest claims are supported by medical records that clearly connect diagnoses to the crash, billing records that show treatment was necessary, and documentation that supports lost wages or reduced earning ability.


