Many AI-style tools work by using averages—injury severity, treatment length, and broad categories of losses. That can be useful early on, but it often breaks down in real cases.
In Shelton, common realities can throw off a calculator’s assumptions:
- Liability may involve more than one party. A crash might implicate the driver and also the carrier’s safety practices, maintenance, or loading procedures.
- Causation gets contested. Insurers frequently argue that symptoms are unrelated, especially when there’s a gap between the crash and the first follow-up.
- Local evidence isn’t always “clean.” Not every collision has usable dashcam video, and scene documentation can be limited once traffic clears.
A tool can provide a range, but it can’t evaluate how Washington insurers will challenge your medical timeline or how strong your evidence is for fault.


