Most settlement tools work like this: you enter injury and loss categories, and the tool outputs a rough range.
That can be useful as a starting point, but it usually can’t account for what insurers challenge most often in truck cases, such as:
- Liability complexity (driver + employer + maintenance/inspection issues)
- Causation disputes (insurers claiming symptoms weren’t caused by the collision)
- Documentation gaps (treatment timelines, imaging, and work restriction notes)
- Virginia-specific negotiation pressure (early settlement tactics before injuries stabilize)
In Radford, we also see how quickly evidence can disappear—dashcam footage gets overwritten, witnesses move on, and scene conditions change. The “right” number depends on whether the case is supported by strong records.


