Most AI calculators work by asking questions like injury severity, treatment length, and claimed expenses—then outputting a rough range. That can be useful if you’re trying to understand the shape of your claim.
However, calculators often miss the parts of Roy cases that decide outcomes:
- Utah injury documentation timing: Adjusters may scrutinize gaps in treatment, delays in imaging, or inconsistent symptom reporting.
- Crash evidence quality: In commuter-area crashes, videos, dashcam footage, and witness details can be critical—yet many tools assume clean, complete records.
- Trucking-specific liability complexity: Fault may involve the driver, the carrier, maintenance providers, or loading practices. A calculator can’t weigh disputed responsibility.
A calculator is a starting point. A settlement is built from proof.


