AI-based calculators typically rely on simplified inputs—injury severity, time to recovery, and broad categories of damages. That can help you think in ranges. What it can’t do well is account for the kinds of disputes that commonly arise in Michigan trucking claims.
In Mount Clemens-area cases, calculators often fall short on factors like:
- Comparative fault arguments (insurers may claim you were partially responsible for a lane, merge, or speed issue)
- Causation challenges (they may argue your condition existed before the crash or worsened for another reason)
- Document delays (maintenance logs, driver records, and onboard data can take time to obtain)
- Local proof gaps (a lack of clear witness statements or footage from a specific intersection/road segment)
That’s why the output from any calculator should be treated like a rough map, not a destination.


