AI-generated ranges often look objective—until you compare them to how adjusters evaluate claims in the real world. In Romulus-area cases, insurers commonly focus on:
- Whether the timeline is consistent (symptoms appearing soon after the crash or incident vs. delays)
- Whether treatment followed recommendations (and whether there are unexplained gaps)
- Whether cognitive symptoms are supported by medical and functional evidence
- Whether liability is provable (including how fault is discussed in negotiations)
An AI tool might prompt you to enter “severity” and “symptoms,” but it can’t verify imaging results, interpret neurologic findings, or assess whether the evidence would hold up if the claim is contested.


