AI tools typically work like a questionnaire: you enter symptoms, treatment history, and basic impact details, and the tool outputs a rough range. That can help you organize questions—but for Burlington residents, the gap between AI output and settlement reality is commonly driven by:
- Proof timing: Iowa claims are very sensitive to whether symptoms and follow-up care appear promptly after the incident.
- Consistency of documentation: insurers in any market look for a coherent story across ER notes, follow-ups, and provider impressions.
- Functional impact evidence: in TBI cases, the “paper” diagnosis matters less than the described limits—sleep disruption, headaches, memory lapses, focus problems, and how those affect work and daily life.
- Negation arguments: defendants commonly argue symptoms were caused by something else (migraine history, stress, prior injuries, unrelated events).
A useful AI estimator should be treated as a checklist—not as a promise.


