You shouldn’t have to be a technology expert to know something important is going on. In real cases, “AI” may show up indirectly—such as:
- automated summaries or machine-drafted clinical notes
- decision-support language in perioperative documentation
- imaging interpretation references tied to software tools
- inconsistencies between what was recorded and what you were told
But here’s the key point for Hewitt families: the existence of AI language doesn’t automatically prove negligence. What matters is whether the clinical team used the tool responsibly, verified critical information, and responded appropriately when the patient’s condition required independent judgment.


