In real Park Forest cases, “AI involvement” usually comes up in one of three ways:
- Automated or machine-assisted documentation: notes, summaries, or transcribed statements that feel incomplete, inconsistent, or out of sync with the operative record.
- Software-supported imaging or review: delays, missed findings, or wording in radiology/imaging reports that raises concerns about how results were interpreted and acted on.
- Decision-support or risk tools: systems used to estimate risk, guide timing, or support clinical decisions—followed by outcomes that suggest the tool wasn’t appropriately validated for the patient’s situation.
The key point for residents to understand: the presence of AI doesn’t automatically prove malpractice. But it can change what must be investigated—because the “why” behind the outcome may involve workflow, supervision, and documentation integrity.


