AI tools can be appealing because they promise speed and clarity. You plug in basics—injury severity, age, treatment—and get an output that looks like a number.
But in real Salem Lakes cases, the “why” matters just as much as the “what.” Many disputes turn on questions like:
- whether the collision or event caused the neurological damage claimed,
- what functional limitations are supported by medical records,
- how future care will likely change, and
- whether the evidence is strong enough to justify the top end of a valuation.
An AI estimate can help you understand categories of damages, but it can’t measure the strength of causation in your record.


