AI tools are usually designed to produce a quick range based on inputs like injury severity, age, and anticipated care. For many people, that first number can feel like relief—because it turns uncertainty into something measurable.
But in real Converse-area cases, the “starting point” can be misleading when key details aren’t captured, such as:
- Whether the injury is complete vs. incomplete and how your function changes over time
- Complications that can follow traumatic spinal injuries (skin breakdown risk, respiratory concerns, bowel/bladder dysfunction)
- Whether the record supports causation between the crash and your specific neurological findings
The practical takeaway: use AI as a worksheet, not as a substitute for medical documentation and a case-specific damages theory.


