AI tools typically work from simplified inputs (injury severity, age, treatment type). That’s not automatically wrong—just incomplete.
In real Conneaut cases, insurers often focus on questions like:
- Was the injury immediately neurological, or did symptoms emerge later?
- What do imaging and specialist notes actually show?
- How documented are functional limits (transfers, standing tolerance, bladder/bowel management, mobility aids)?
- Are future care needs supported by a life-care plan or treating recommendations?
If those pieces aren’t clearly documented, an AI number can trend too low—or sometimes too high—depending on the assumptions the tool uses.


