Many online tools promise quick ranges based on a few inputs (injury severity, age, and similar factors). The problem is that Durham-area cases often turn on details that don’t fit neatly into a questionnaire—for example:
- How the incident happened during commuting (intersection impacts, rear-end collisions, lane changes on busy corridors)
- Whether the injury was promptly documented after an initial ER visit or whether symptoms evolved later
- The practical reality of mobility needs and home setup in the Triangle area (stairs, accessibility, transportation, caregiver availability)
- Whether the medical record clearly supports causation and prognosis
In other words, the “math” may look plausible, but the legal value depends on what Durham juries and adjusters can actually verify from records.


